Transition from World War II to the Cold War
The emerging divide between West and East
American hegemony and the emerging global orders
Military and security
Political and diplomatic
Economics and trade
How did the events of the late 19th and early 20th centuries shape the development of the Cold War?
Who were some of the key players involved in shaping US foreign policy during the early Cold War years?
What were the key features of the US-led global order that emerges after Wolrd War II?
President Roosevelt dies April 12, 1945.
President Truman takes office and is informed of the Manhattan Project
May 8, 1945: Nazi Germany surrenders to allies
The war in the Pacific carries on
Invasion?
Demonstration?
Bombing?
Henry Stimson
Secretary of War under Roosevelt and Truman
Opposes calls for demonstration of atomic weapons
Influential in selecting targets
Decision is made to use the bombs
Nagasaki bombed on August 9, 1945
Japan surrenders on August 14, 1945
To right: Replica of “Fat Man”, bomb dropped on Nagasaki
Tensions between the US and USSR go back long before World War II
Longstanding ideological opposition to communism
Soviet skepticism of Western intensions during war (the second front)
Soviets want secure borders in Europe
Key post-war events
Soviets absorb occupied territories, which become the Warsaw Pact States
British begin cutting aid to Greece and Turkey in 1946
Soviets making claims on territory in Iran and Turkey
The Truman Doctrine
First outlined in President Truman’s March 1947 speech before Congress
Promises to support free peoples resisting tyrannical governments
Also lays foundations for foreign aid programs by calling for assistance to Greece and Turkey
To right: President Harry Truman
The Marshall Plan
General George Marshall, Secretary of State under President Truman
June 1947: Delivered Harvard’s commencement speech. The “opening shot” of the Marshall Plan
Catalyst for what would become the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
To right: General George C. Marshall
George F. Kennan
Director of Policy Planning, US State Department, Ambassador to the USSR
Father of containment doctrine
Author of the “Long Telegram” and the infamous “X Article” in Foreign Affairs
Emphasis on non-military resistance to Soviet expansion
Paul Nitze
Contemporary of George Kennan
Second Director of Policy Planning
Primary author of NSC–68
Supported a more militant version of Kennan’s containment strategy
Later events:
Communist coup in Czechoslovakia (1948)
Yugoslav–Soviet split (1948)
Communist victory in China (1949)
USSR detonates atomic bomb (1949)
Chinese-Soviet Alliance (1950)
Korean War (1950–1953)
Communist parties gain strength in Europe after WWII
Hegemony is a preponderance of global power
Note that this means a hegemonic power doesn't get everything it wants. But more power helps in bargaining processes.
US emerges from World War II with unparalleled economic and military power
Europe, not so much
US foreign policy focuses on three goals:
Checking Soviet expansion
Promoting recovery of war-torn areas
Promoting greater global integration
Goal of promoting integration is a reaction to World War I and Western liberal political thought (e.g. Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, etc.)
US embarks on a massive order-building project
The emergent order is often referred to as a “liberal hegemonic” order, or as “liberal internationalism”
Three central pillars
Security
Diplomacy and governance
Economic
What does a liberal internationalist/hegemonic order look like?
It emphasized a few key concepts
US leadership (with constraints)
Primacy of a rules-based system of global governance
Multilateral cooperation and in economic and security affairs
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Central Treaty Organization (CENTO)
United Nations (UN)
Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO)
Establish standards and principles to govern the post-War world
Provide forum for dispute resolution between states
Determine the fate of colonial territories and societies
United Nations (UN)
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
World Health Organization
United Nations Human Rights Council
Promoting democracy
US seeking to promote democracy abroad
Much of this is rooted in opposition to communism
Much of this effort conflicts with treatment of minority Americans at home
Many fear that US efforts to promote democracy and the rule of law will be applied unevenly across the international landscape
To right: James Byrnes, Secretary of State 1945-1947
Secretary of STate. Also a staunch segregationist.
Brynes served in the House, Senate, and briefly as an associate justice on the US supreme court (though his tenure is the shortest on record). He played an important role in blocking anti-lynching legislation, blocking support for black colleges and universities, and also in maintaining white control over Democratic Party politics in South Carolina.
The State Department and various US officials worried that the Untied Nations Commission on Human Rights might have the power to investigate human rights abuses within the US. Also worried that it might be able to compel the US to impose equal protections for blacks and other minority groups. Also sought to prevent the commission from having the power to investigate petitions brought by various minority groups.
US immediately sought to weaken these institutions for fear that they would be used against the US. They also sought to limit petitions to come only from member states (i.e. not from individuals or non-governmental organizations).
This is exactly what happened---the National Negro Congress brought a petition to the UN on June 6, 1946 that outlined the oppression of black Americans (See Anderson 2003, 80-81).
Promote greater economic integration among all states
Remove barriers to trade and investment
Reaction to interwar period and Great Depression and move to autarky
Bretton Woods System
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)
World Bank
International Monetary Fund (IMF)
What does all this mean for US foreign policy?
What does all this mean for US foreign policy?
Big changes, that’s what!
What does all this mean for US foreign policy?
Big changes, that’s what!
The US is in a position to manage many, many more relationships than in the past, and those issues are increasingly technical in nature (e.g. trade, nuclear weapons, etc.)
The issue of race relations in the US was a major focus in the lead up to the conferences laying out the United Nations
Domestic groups used foreign policy statements and international institutions to call attention to domestic injustices
International actors pointed to US domestic problems with race to undermine its rhetoric for justice, equality, and democracy abroad.
European considerations:
Other Countries:
Intra-European competition
Other countries:
Transition from World War II to the Cold War
The emerging divide between West and East
American hegemony and the emerging global orders
Military and security
Political and diplomatic
Economics and trade
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |